Fact Check: FAKE Videos Show Women Told To Leave Courtrooms Because Of How They Dress
Viral videos of women being kicked out of court for inappropriate outfits are not real, as they show signs of being AI-generated.
Are videos of women being kicked out of court for outfits described as “inappropriate” real? No, that’s not true: Multiple low-quality viral videos following the same script and posted by the same creators show signs of AI. Evidence of AI origin includes abnormal hand anatomy and a judge’s podium at the back of the courtroom instead of the front.
The claim appeared in a video (archived here) published on TikTok on December 7, 2025. The caption read:
woman shows up to court in gym clothes and gets kicked out of the courtroom by judge#court.
The video showed the following exchange:
JUDGE: Get out!
WOMAN: What? I didn’t even say anything yet.
JUDGE: You are not allowed in here dressed like that, no way.
WOMAN: I mean, what do I wear then? Never been here before.
JUDGE: Ask someone outside the room… go.
WOMAN: So like, do I come back? Or is this like jail right now?
JUDGE: Just get out.
This is what the post looked like on TikTok at the time of writing:
Early in the video, one of the woman’s hands that looks more or less normal for most of the video shapeshifts from its anatomically incorrect appearance in the first frame:
Within the next few seconds, the pendant on her neck disappears and reappears again on its own:
Another telling sign pointing to AI appears in the background. It’s a man’s hand growing out of his chair’s armrest:
The account on TikTok that published this video spread other similar clips:
The clip displayed a watermark that led to a Facebook account (archived here) labeled as a “digital creator”:
The same account posted other videos that claimed to authentically show women being removed from other courtrooms (for example, here and here):
As seen in the composite image above, in one of the videos, one of the woman’s fingers didn’t move, unlike the rest of her hand; in another clip, the woman approaching the judge somehow had the judge’s podium behind her. Additionally, the bailiff did nothing to prevent her from entering the courtroom, although people are generally not allowed to be barefoot in courts (archived here).
A Man Filming in Public Was Told He Would Be Arrested to Prevent a Crime That Had Not Happened Yet — He Asked If This Was Minority Report
A video shared to X by the account @Skint_Eastwood1 showed a man speaking with a police officer in the United Kingdom about his right to film in public.
“I’m breaking no laws. I’m not approaching people. People are approaching me,” he said in the clip.
The officer issued a warning, looking at the reactions of others nearby rather than any action by the man himself. “And all I’m saying is if you carry on, then there will be issues, alright?” she said. The man asked her to clarify who the issues would come from, and she replied, “With the police.”
The man asked the officer to identify which law he was breaking. “Me and my colleagues have explained it many times. We can arrest someone to prevent a breach of the peace,” she replied.
When the man said an arrest should only follow an actual offense, the officer told him they were acting pre-emptively. “We’re arresting you to prevent it from you doing something wrong,” she said, adding that officers would not “leave you to carry on winding people up.”
The man compared the reasoning to a work of fiction, asking, “What is this, like, Minority Report, like, a crime that might happen in the future? You’re going to prevent it?” The officer replied, “Yeah, you can prevent the breach of it.”
The majority of the reactions to the video sided with the man filming rather than the officer’s explanation. One commenter wrote, “‘We’re going to arrest you to prevent someone else from committing a crime against you.’ Never give up your guns.”
Some commenters questioned the officer’s reasoning. “She agreed that he doesn’t break the law and continues to say if he carries on (not breaking the law?) he will get in trouble. Why is she allowed to wear the uniform?” a commenter wrote.
The @Skint_Eastwood1 account that shared the video described the exchange as an example of officers responding to a hypothetical threat rather than an actual offense.
“Officers should be de-escalating and protecting lawful behaviour, not threatening people with arrest for hypothetical future crimes by others,” the post read, calling the situation “absolutely disgraceful.”
The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the events described in this video. The details above reflect the account as shared on X by @Skint_Eastwood1. The identities of the man and the officer, along with the specific location, have not been confirmed.
